Lansing Community College
Procedure Details

Procedure Title: Program Review
Procedure #: AA.016
Revision #: 002

Unit Responsible: Academic Affairs
Individual Responsible: Director of Academic Quality

Effective Date: 03/27/2026
Initial Approval Date: 03/18/2022
Last Review/Update Date: 03/27/2026
Next Review Date: 03/01/2029

*Does this procedure support a Board Policy? Yes
If yes, identify: 3.160 – Program Review

Board policies can be found at: LCC Board of Trustees Policy Page

*Does this procedure support HLC criteria and/or Assumed Practices? Yes
If yes, identify: 2A, 3F

HLC Criteria can be found at: HLC Accreditation Criteria
HLC Assumed Practices can be found at: HLC Assumed Practices

*Does this procedure support a State or Federal Regulation? Yes
If yes, identify: The Program Review of Occupational Education (PROE) for Perkins-eligible programs is now included within the Program Review process.

*Note: Standard Operating Procedures should be in furtherance of some LCC policy and/or accreditation criteria, even if the relationship is not direct. Assistance in determining this information can be obtained from the Academic Procedure Advisory Committee (APAC) and/or the Accreditation Liaison Officer.

Program Review, BP 3.160

1. Purpose

To implement the Board policy on Program Review, and to ensure compliance with Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Criteria for Accreditation and Assumed Practices.


2. Scope

Applies to academic programs offering credit-bearing courses.

Consortium Programs: Special circumstances apply to programs that are part of a consortium. If the host college for a consortium program is not Lansing Community College (LCC), then LCC does not need to conduct a program review for that program. If LCC is the host college for a consortium program which maintains specialized accreditation, then the accreditation reports may serve as program review documentation.


3. Prerequisites

HLC Core Component 3F states: “The institution improves its curriculum based on periodic program review." Assumed Practices 2Biv states: "Faculty participate substantially in: analysis of data and appropriate action on assessment of student learning and program completion."

Academic Programs begin the Program Review process only after they have successfully undergone the Credential Review. The Program Review process is on a four-year cycle.

Within the Program Review process, programs are required to complete a questionnaire and an Annual Improvement Plan. The Annual Improvement Plan, as approved, is to be used to inform Program Operating Plans throughout the years leading up to the next Program Review. Program Operating Plans guide the development of individual faculty members, Professional Activity Plans which direct their non-teaching activities.

For state-approved occupational programs, the State of Michigan has approved folding the required Program Review of Occupational Education (PROE) report required for programs receiving federal Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act funding into our College-wide Program Review process.


4. Responsibilities

  • Director of Academic Quality (DAQ) - Responsible for ensuring that all academic programs are reviewed on a regular, cyclical basis.
  • Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) - Assist the DAQ in identifying aspects of the review process pertaining to HLC Criteria.
  • Center for Data Science (CDS) - Provide the necessary data for program review and assist as needed with the interpretation of data.


5. Procedure

  • DAQ and the ALO will review the procedure for Program Review annually and ensure its alignment with HLC Criteria and Assumed Practices.
  • The DAQ will maintain a regular, cyclical schedule for all academic programs to undergo program review.

The Program Review process is as follows:

  1. All College programs have been placed on a Program Review calendar, with Perkins-eligible programs identified.
  2. In the Spring semester prior to the beginning of the Program Review year, faculty in programs designated to begin Program Review select representatives to participate in the Center for Teaching Excellence Pedagogy of Equity course as preparation for the curricular review included in the Program Review. 
  3. The Program Review year begins with a kickoff in early Fall I semester. Programs will meet with the Program Review team to review the process and set up small group meetings to help programs as they move through their analysis process.
  4. Specific Program Review Team members have been identified to work with questions related to their areas of expertise:
    • Description of program, analysis of progress since last Program Review, and program currency/relevancy including review of course transferability - DAQ;
    • Strengths/Weaknesses/Opportunities/Threats (SWOT) Analysis and CIP/SOC Code review - Associate Dean/Director with input from CDS, Academic Affairs, and DAQ;
    • Enrollment and Success/Persistence/Retention/Completion – CDS;
    • Assessment - Director of Assessment;
    • Financial Analysis – Financial Analyst in Financial Performance Analysis and Review (FPAR);
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion - Center for Teaching Excellence Director;
    • Perkins-eligible specific questions (CPI data, enrollment/completion data, analysis of surveys data) - Perkins Coordinator with input from CDS; and
    • Annual Improvement Plan - DAQ
  5. CDS maintains an institutional data dashboard which faculty access to pull program-specific data. Programs are asked to review the available data reports and notify CDS if they require additional data (specific transfer partner information, more detailed demographic breakdown, etc.).
  6. The FPAR will post financial data worksheets to the SharePoint sites for programs that will be undergoing program Review in October. Programs are asked to review the worksheets and notify FPAR if they require assistance in reviewing and interpreting the data.
  7. Programs will then work on their analysis through the Spring semester and submit draft reports by mid-April.
  8. The Program Review Team will provide feedback on drafts by the end of Spring semester.
  9. Programs will then revise their reports and submit their final draft by end of September  of Fall II semester.
  10. The Program Review Team scores the final drafts according to a rubric (1 – Does Not Meet Expectations; 2 – Meets with Concerns; 3 – Meets Expectations; 4 – Exceeds Expectations and schedules a closeout meeting with each program, their Directors, Associate Deans, Deans, Academic Senate President, Curriculum Committee Chair, the Provost, and the Program Review Team in November of Fall II semester.
    1. Programs which fail to achieve scores of 3 on all sections of the Program Review Questionnaire and Annual Improvement Plan are required to complete a Monitoring Report, delivered to the Provost, in order to address any deficiencies in their final draft.  

6. Reference


7. Definitions

Accreditation Liaison Officer (ALO) – The individual identified by LCC to serve as a contact point with the Higher Learning Commission, in addition to the College’s President. The ALO is expected to be aware of HLC requirements and to guide the College’s efforts in relation to compliance.

Center for Data Science (CDS) – offers institutional perspective and understanding by providing expertise and analysis in pursuit of continuous improvement to support the College's culture of inquiry and strategic decision making.

Director of Academic Quality (DAQ) – works collaboratively and cross-functionally with other members of the Academic Affairs team, as well as with personnel from across the College, to implement initiatives and tasks related to Academic quality and continuous improvement.

Specialized Accreditation – quality assurance provided by accrediting agencies that recognize the individual programs.  
Perkins Grant, formally known as the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act (Perkins V) - has the primary goal to improve academic knowledge, technical skills, and employability for students enrolled in postsecondary and secondary CTE programs.