Procedure Details
Procedure Title: Student Title IX Grievance Process
Procedure #: SA.006
Revision #: 000
Unit Responsible: Office of Student Compliance, Student Affairs Division
Individual Responsible: Director of Student Compliance (Student process), Title IX Coordinator (Employee
process)
Effective Date:
Initial Approval Date:
Last Review/Update Date:
Next Review Date:
*Does this procedure support a Board Policy? Yes
If yes, identify: 4.120 – Prohibited Sex or Gender Based Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct
Board policies can be found at: LCC Board of Trustees Policy Page
*Does this procedure support HLC criteria? No
If yes, identify: N/A
HLC Criteria can be found at: HLC Accreditation Criteria
*Does this procedure support a State or Federal Regulation? Yes
If yes, identify: Title IX of the Higher Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et
seq.
*Note: Standard Operating Procedures should be in furtherance of some LCC policy and/or accreditation criteria, even if the relationship is not direct. Assistance in determining this information can be obtained from the Academic Procedure Advisory Committee (APAC) and/or the Accreditation Liaison Officer.
Student Title IX Grievance Process, BP 4.120
Purpose
The College is committed to providing programs, activities and an educational environment free from sex and gender discrimination. As a recipient of federal funds, Lansing Community College is required to comply with Title IX of the Higher Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs or activities. As a public institution, the College also must provide due process to students accused of sexual harassment. This grievance process is designed to provide a fair, consistent, and reliable process for all parties.
Scope
This procedure applies to all members of the Lansing Community College Community including students, employees, volunteers, guests, vendors, contractors and visitors to campus.
Prerequisites
All members of the Lansing Community College Community, regardless of their sex, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression, have the right to engage in their College education, work, and other activities free from all forms of sex or gender based discrimination or harassment, including sexual harassment. Sexual harassment includes quid pro quo harassment, unwelcome conduct, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking, each as more fully defined below. All members of the LCC community are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that does not infringe upon the rights of others. In addition to sexual harassment, Title IX also includes, but is not limited to, pregnancy/pregnancy-related issues and equality in athletics, academic programs, and activities.
Anyone who engages in sexual harassment violates College policy, federal and state
civil rights laws, and may also be subject to criminal prosecution. The College is
committed to fostering a community that promotes prompt reporting of all types of
sexual harassment and fair, consistent, reliable, and reasonably prompt resolution
of sexual harassment complaints. Retaliation by any party involved in the grievance
process is expressly prohibited, and could result in a Student Code of Conduct violation.
Creating a safe environment is the responsibility of all members of the College community.
The College will not restrict rights protected under the U.S. Constitution, including
the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment, when complying with
Title IX.
Lansing Community College (LCC) strives to protect the learning and employment environment for all students. The health, safety, and well-being of all students is a primary concern to the College. If a student, or someone they know, may be the victim of sexual harassment, including stalking, dating and domestic violence, or sexual assault, they are strongly urged to seek immediate assistance. Assistance can be obtained 24 hours a day, seven days a week, from:
- Lansing Community College Police and Public Safety – (517) 483-1800
- Local Police (Lansing Police Department) – 911 or (517) 483-4600 (non-emergency)
- MSU Sexual Assault Health Care Program – (517) 353-2700
- MSU Center for Survivors - (517) 372-6666
- Joyful Heart Hotline- (212)-475-2026
- Listening Ear Crisis Line (East Lansing, MI) – (517) 337-1717
- Women’s Resource Center of Greater Lansing – (517) 372-9163
- End Violent Encounters (EVE) – (517) 372-5572
- Capital Area Response Effort (CARE) – (517) 272-7436
- SAFE Center (domestic violence) – (St. Johns, MI) - (877) 952-7283
- National Domestic Violence Hotline – (800) 799-7233 or text START to 88788
During business hours Monday through Friday, parties are also strongly urged to contact one of the following Title IX Coordinators as soon as reasonably possible to report any sexual harassment that may have occurred, or during non-business hours by making on online report, or initiating contact by phone or email. Any member of the LCC community may file a complaint on behalf of a complainant regarding a responding student.
A complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the education program or activity of the College at the time a formal complaint is filed. A respondent is an individual who is being reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute sexual harassment and who is a person enrolled by the College or who has any other affiliation or connection with the College.
SECTION 1: Jurisdiction and Timing/ Retaliation and Related Misconduct/ Effect of Criminal Proceedings
1.1 Jurisdiction
Any member of the LCC community may file a complaint on behalf of a complainant regarding a responding student. A complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the education program or activity of the College at the time a formal complaint is filed. A respondent is an individual who is being reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute sexual harassment and who is a person enrolled by the College or who has any other affiliation or connection with the College.
The College, upon actual knowledge of sexual harassment when it occurs in the College’s education program or activity, against a person in the United States, will respond promptly to the alleged sexual harassment in a manner that is not deliberately indifferent, which means a response that is not clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances.
Education program or activity includes locations, events, or circumstances over which the College exercises substantial control over both the respondent and the context in which the sexual harassment occurred, and also includes any building owned or controlled by the College. Title IX applies to all education programs or activities of the College, whether such programs or activities occur on-campus or off-campus.
1.2 Timing of Complaints and Procedures
As long as there is jurisdiction over the complaint pursuant to Section 1.1, above, there is no time limit to invoking this process in responding to complaints of alleged sexual harassment. Nevertheless, students are encouraged to report alleged sexual harassment immediately in order to maximize the College's ability to obtain evidence and conduct a prompt and equitable investigation.
Delays in reporting alleged sexual harassment may result in the loss of jurisdiction, relevant evidence, witness testimony, and may impair the College's ability to engage in this process.
The College will conclude the grievance process in a reasonably prompt time frame. The grievance process may be temporary delayed for good cause and with written notice to the parties of the delay or extension and the reasons for the action. Good cause may include, but is not limited to, considerations such as the absence of a party, a party’s advisor, or a witness; concurrent law enforcement activity; or the need for language assistance or accommodation of disabilities.
1.3 Retaliation
No person shall be penalized for good faith utilization of channels available for resolving concerns dealing with prohibited discrimination or harassment. Lansing Community College strictly prohibits any adverse or retaliatory action against any individual for making a good faith report, providing information, exercising one’s rights or responsibilities under College policy, or otherwise being involved in the process of responding to, investigating, or addressing or opposing any alleged incidents of prohibited discrimination or harassment, including allegations of sexual harassment. Any person who engages in any retaliatory actions against any such individual for having engaged in these legally protected activities will be subject to disciplinary action that may include, but is not limited to, expulsion from the College. In addition, any person who engages in such retaliatory actions may be subject to criminal prosecution and may become liable in civil litigation.
Making deliberately false accusations of discrimination or harassment violates College policy and may violate other standards of conduct. In such instances, the complainant will be subject to disciplinary action. However, failure to prove a claim of discrimination or harassment does not constitute proof of a false and/or malicious accusation.
No recipient or other person may intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against an individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX, or because an individual has made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing. Intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination (including charges against an individual for code of conduct violations that do not involve sex discrimination or sexual harassment, but arise out of the same facts or circumstances) for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege under Title IX, constitutes retaliation.
Anyone who is aware of possible retaliation or has concerns regarding the response to a complaint of prohibited discrimination or harassment, including sexual harassment, should immediately report such concerns to the Title IX Coordinator, who will investigate the matter and pursue any appropriate corrective action.
1.4 Other Related Misconduct
In accordance with this process, the Panel in a formal process and Presiding Officer in an Informal Resolution is empowered to hear allegations of, and to impose sanctions for, sexual harassment and any other violation(s) of the College's Student Code of Conduct directly related to the alleged sexual harassment. Such related misconduct may include, without limitation, violations of the rules of privacy as articulated herein, violations of Supportive Measures, retaliation, and/or violations of other Student Code of Conduct provisions that occurred in the course of the alleged sexual harassment.
It is not the practice of the College to pursue disciplinary action against a complainant or witness for their improper use of alcohol or drugs (e.g., underage drinking or violation of the College Drug and Alcohol Policy), provided that such student is acting in good faith as a complainant or witness to the events of the alleged sexual harassment.
Students who appear before the Panel or Presiding Officer, whether as parties to the proceedings or as witnesses, are expected to provide truthful testimony in accordance with the College's Student Code of Conduct.
1.5 Concurrent Criminal Charges
Because sexual harassment may constitute both a violation of College policy and criminal activity in certain incidents, the College encourages students to report alleged sexual harassment promptly to local law enforcement agencies. Criminal investigations may be useful in the gathering of relevant evidence, particularly forensic evidence. Because the standards for finding a violation of criminal law are different from the standards for finding a violation of the Student Code of Conduct, criminal investigations or reports are not determinative of whether sexual harassment, for purposes of this process or the Student Code of Conduct, has occurred. In other words, conduct may constitute sexual harassment under this process even if law enforcement agencies lack sufficient evidence of a crime and therefore decline to prosecute. In such cases, the complainant may not initially understand the results of the criminal investigation, the nature of criminal procedure, or the grounds for the law enforcement decision not to prosecute. The complainant in such cases may request that the Student Title IX Coordinator provide a list of advocacy resources in the community who may be able to assist the complainant with any meetings with the prosecutor to gain an understanding of the decision to decline a prosecution.
The filing of a complaint of sexual harassment under this process is independent of any criminal investigation or proceeding, and (except that the College's investigation may be delayed temporarily while the criminal investigators are gathering evidence) the College will not wait for the conclusion of any criminal investigation or proceedings to commence its own investigation and implement supportive measures to protect the complainant and the College community, if necessary, as described in Section 2.4. Respondents who are concurrently facing criminal charges and who choose not to appear or answer questions to avoid self-incrimination that could be used against them in a criminal proceeding, will not be found responsible solely based on their refusal to provide self-incriminating statements.
Responsibilities
To file a complaint against a student:
File report against student
Student Title IX Coordinator
JR Beauboeuf
Director of Risk Management
Equal Opportunity Officer & Title IX Coordinator
309 N. Washington Square
Lansing, MI 48933
Phone: 517-483-1730
Email: beauboej@lcc.edu
To file a complaint against an employee:
File report against employee
Employee Title IX Coordinator
JR Beauboeuf
Director of Risk Management
Equal Opportunity Officer & Title IX Coordinator
309 N. Washington Square
Lansing, MI 48933
Phone: 517-483-1730
Email: beauboej@lcc.edu
Procedure
SECTION 2: Process – Initial Steps
The College, upon actual knowledge of sexual harassment when it occurs in the College’s education program or activity, against a person in the United States, will respond promptly to the alleged sexual harassment in a manner that is not deliberately indifferent, which means a response that is not clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances.
- Education program or activity includes locations, events, or circumstances over which the College exercises substantial control over both the respondent and the context in which the sexual harassment occurred, and also includes any building owned or controlled by the College. Title IX applies to all of the College’s education programs or activities, whether such programs or activities occur on-campus or off-campus.
The College will treat complainants and respondents equitably, and will follow the grievance process before the imposition of any disciplinary sanctions or other actions that are not supportive measures, against a respondent. The College may remove a respondent from the College’s education program or activity on an emergency basis based on criteria outlined in the emergency removal provision while the complaint is being addressed. The respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process.
Where a grievance process involves more than one complainant or more than one respondent, references in this process to the singular ‘‘party,’’ ‘‘complainant,’’ or ‘‘respondent’’ include the plural, as applicable.
2.1 Complaint Received
Upon receipt of a complaint/report regarding alleged sexual harassment, the Title
IX Coordinator will promptly contact the complainant confidentially and in writing
to request an intake meeting. The intake meeting will be scheduled through the Student
Compliance Liaison, and confirmed to the complainant in writing. The complainant may
bring an Advisor of their choice (as outlined in 3.6) to the meeting.
2.2 Emergency Removal
The College may remove a respondent from the College’s education program or activity
on an emergency basis if it is determined that an immediate threat to the physical
health or safety of the complainant, any student or other individual arising from
the allegations of sexual harassment justifies removal prior to the conclusion of
the grievance process (or even where no grievance process is pending). Under emergency
removal, the College will complete an individualized safety and risk analysis prior
to initiating the emergency removal, and will provide the respondent with written
notice and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal.
An emergency removal is not limited to instances where the complainant has reported an alleged sexual assault or rape, but could also be justified to address alleged severe, pervasive and objectively offensive verbal or online harassment. The identification of an immediate risk situation is not limited to the details of the alleged sexual harassment incident itself, but may also evaluate and respond to a respondent’s related post-incident actions or behaviors if the respondent’s actions pose an immediate and identified threat, but do not “arise from” allegations of “sexual harassment”.
This provision may not be construed to modify any rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The College will take the following steps when assessing an emergency removal:
Step 1 – Conduct a prompt individualized safety and risk analysis.
The College will promptly convene the Care Team to complete an individualized safety
and risk analysis on the respondent. The Care Team Process will be followed in the
completion of the assessment. The Title IX Coordinator is a member of the Care Team
and will serve as an AdHoc member during any safety and risk analysis to provide information
regarding the allegation(s) and Title IX regulations to the team. The individualized
safety and risk analysis cannot be based upon generalized, hypothetical or speculative
beliefs or assumptions that a respondent could pose a risk to someone’s physical health
or safety.
Step 2 - Make the required findings.
The individualized safety and risk analysis must confirm that there is an “immediate threat” justifying and compelling an emergency removal. The Care Team will consider the significance and weight that should be applied to a complainant’s subjective fear of a threat versus an objective reasonable person standard. The analysis will assess the respondent’s propensity, opportunity, and ability to effectuate a stated or potential threat. The immediate threat must be to the “physical health or safety” of one or more individuals, who may be the respondent, the complainant, or any other individual (such as a third-party witness).
Step 3 – Evaluate the applicability of disability laws to the removal decision.
A respondent may not be subject to an emergency removal without full and appropriate consideration of applicable disability laws. The Care Services Manager, Center for Student Access, serves on the Care Team and will participate in the safety and risk analysis. The Care Services Manager will provide information on applicable disability law provisions, including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and any relevant State laws. The requirements and interplay of disability laws and Title IX will be considered prior to the removal decision.
Step 4 – Consider the appropriateness of supportive measures in lieu of an emergency removal.
Before imposing an emergency removal, the College will ensure that its action does not equate to or effectuate an improper bypassing of the prohibitions against imposition of sanctions or other actions that are not supportive measures without first following the grievance process. The emergency removal analysis requires careful and cautious balancing of concurrent factors – the College’s obligation to offer and provide prompt supportive measures to the complainant to ensure equal educational access; the adverse impacts of separating the respondent from educational opportunities and benefits; and the College’s obligation to protect the health and safety of the College community.
Step 5 – Provide respondent with written notice and opportunity to challenge removal decision.
The respondent will receive written notice of the emergency removal detailing the identified threat of physical safety or harm that compelled the emergency removal decision. The notice will include an opportunity for the respondent to immediately challenge the removal decision. Challenges to the removal decision must be made in writing by submitting the Removal Decision Challenge form within two business days of the written notice of emergency removal. The Dean of Student Affairs (or their designee) will make a final determination on the challenge.
2.3 Complainant Intake Meeting
The complainant will meet with the Title IX Coordinator to discuss the complaint,
the grievance process, other remedies, and the process for filing a formal complaint.
Supportive measures will also be discussed including the availability of supportive
measures; the complainant’s wishes with respect to supportive measures; and the availability
of supportive measures with or without the filing of a formal complaint.
The Title IX Coordinator will gather initial information about the alleged incident,
make an initial assessment regarding the complaint, and seek to determine how the
complainant wishes to proceed, including whether the complainant wishes to file a
formal complaint. If the allegations do not meet the
definition of sexual harassment, or did not occur in the College’s education program
or activity against a person in the United States, the College will formally dismiss
such allegations under Title IX and refer the complaint to the Student Code of Conduct
process when applicable.
2.4 Supportive Measures
Supportive measures are non-disciplinary, non-punitive, and are individualized services
offered as appropriate and reasonably available without fee or charge to the complainant
or the respondent. Supportive measures are offered before or after the filing of a
formal complaint or where no formal complaint has been filed. Such measures are designed
to restore or preserve equal access to the College education program or activity without
unreasonably burdening the other party. This includes measures designed to protect
the safety of all parties or the College educational environment, or to deter sexual
harassment.
Supportive measures may include counseling, extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments, modifications of work or class schedules, campus escort services, mutual restrictions on contact between the parties, changes in work locations, leaves of absence, increased security and monitoring of certain areas of the campus, and other similar measures. The College will maintain as confidential any supportive measures provided to the complainant or respondent, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality would not impair the ability of the College to provide the supportive measures.
The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the effective implementation of supportive measures. If a no contact order between the parties is offered as a supportive measure, the parties will be notified in writing. Violations of supportive measures, such as non-compliance with a no contact order, may lead to a violation of the Student Code of Conduct.
2.5 Formal Complaint
A formal complaint is a document filed by a complainant or signed by the Title IX
Coordinator alleging sexual harassment against a respondent and requesting that the
College investigate the allegation of sexual harassment. At the time of filing a formal
complaint, a complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in
the education program or activity of the College where the formal complaint is filed.
The College may consolidate formal complaints as to allegations of sexual harassment against more than one respondent, or by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations of sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
A complainant’s wishes with respect to whether the College investigates should be respected unless the Title IX Coordinator determines that signing a formal complaint to initiate an investigation over the wishes of the complainant is not clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances. The College will investigate sexual harassment allegations in any formal complaint, signed by a complainant, or by a Title IX Coordinator.
A formal complaint may be filed with the Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, by electronic mail, or through the electronic form.
A complainant can request a formal investigation and hearing process, or an informal resolution process when filing a formal complaint. Without a formal complaint, neither process may commence. The formal complaint must contain the complainant’s physical or digital signature or otherwise indicate that the complainant is the person filing the formal complaint, unless the formal complaint is signed by the Title IX Coordinator as outlined above.
2.6 Notice of Allegations
Upon receipt of a formal complaint, the College will provide written notice to the
parties (who are known). The notice will include the alleged sexual harassment, including
sufficient details known at the time and with sufficient time to prepare a response
before any initial meeting. Sufficient details include the identities of the parties
(if known) involved in the alleged incident, the alleged conduct constituting sexual
harassment, and the date and location (if known) of the alleged incident. If supportive
measures have been implemented that will involve both parties, such as a no contact
order, this will be included in the written notice.
The respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process. The written notice will include this statement along with information that the parties may have an Advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney. An Advisor may accompany the complainant or respondent in meetings and interviews, but does not have an active speaking role. The written notice will include a link to the grievance process, and inform the parties that the Student Code of Conduct prohibits knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process.
The written notice will include a request for the respondent to schedule an intake meeting with the Title IX Coordinator. The intake meeting will be scheduled through the Student Compliance Liaison, and confirmed to the respondent in writing. The respondent may bring an Advisor of their choice (as outlined above) to the meeting.
2.7 Respondent Intake Meeting
The respondent will first meet with the Title IX Coordinator to discuss the complaint,
the grievance process, and the formal complaint process. Supportive measures will
also be discussed including the availability of supportive measures; the respondent’s
wishes with respect to supportive measures; and review of supportive measures relative
to both parties (if applicable).
2.8 Dismissal of Formal Complaint
Mandatory Dismissal
The College must investigate the allegations in a formal complaint, as outlined in Section 3. If the conduct alleged in the formal complaint does not constitute sexual harassment as defined under Title IX, even if proved, did not occur in the College’s education program or activity, or did not occur against a person in the United States; then the College will dismiss the formal complaint with regard to this process under Title IX, and refer it to the Student Code of Conduct process as applicable.
Discretionary Dismissal
The College may dismiss a formal complaint or any allegations therein, if at any time
during the investigation or hearing: A complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator
in writing that the complainant
would like to withdraw the formal complaint or any allegations therein; the respondent
is no longer enrolled at the College; or specific circumstances prevent the College
from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination as to the formal complaint
or allegations therein.
The College will promptly send written notice of a dismissal and the reason(s) for the dismissal simultaneously to the parties.
SECTION 3: Investigation
When a formal complaint has been received, the Title IX Coordinator will forward the formal complaint to the Title IX Investigator, who will initiate an investigation. The Title IX Investigator is designated to conduct investigations of alleged sexual harassment and receives training on issues of relevance to create an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence. The Student Title IX Coordinator and the Deputy Student Title IX Coordinator are also trained investigators and may be part of an investigative team when necessary.
The investigation will be conducted in a reasonably prompt time frame, and complainants and respondents will be treated in an equitable manner. If, in the course of an investigation, the College decides to investigate allegations about the complainant or respondent that are not included in the initial notice of allegations to the parties, the College will provide notice of the additional allegations to the parties whose identities are known.
3.1 Meeting Notice
The College will provide parties whose participation is invited or expected with written
notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all investigative
interviews, other meetings, and hearings with sufficient time for the party to prepare
to participate. All meetings and interviews will be scheduled through the Student
Compliance Liaison.
3.2 Advisors
Both parties may have others present during any meeting, interview, and grievance
proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied by an Advisor of their choice,
who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney. The Advisor does not have an active
speaking role in meetings, interviews, and grievance proceedings, but is permitted
to ask the other party and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions,
including those challenging credibility during cross-examination at a live hearing.
In addition, the Advisor may inspect and review evidence provided to the parties.
3.3 Witnesses
The College will provide an equal opportunity for the parties to provide witnesses,
including fact and expert witnesses that may offer relevant evidence, no matter which
side or whose version of events that evidence or witness supports, and other inculpatory
and exculpatory evidence. In addition, the College may identify additional witnesses
during and throughout the investigation relevant to the incident.
3.4 Evidence
When investigating a formal complaint and throughout the grievance process, the College
will ensure that the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient
to reach a determination regarding responsibility will rest on the College and not
on the parties.
3.5 Medical Records
The College will not access, consider, disclose, or otherwise use a party’s records
that are made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized
professional or paraprofessional acting in their professional capacity, or assisting
in that capacity, and which are made and maintained in connection with the provision
of treatment to the party, unless the College obtains that party’s voluntary, written
consent.
3.6 Sexual History of the Complainant
Evidence about a complainant’s sexual predisposition will not be included in the investigative
report and evidence about a complainant’s prior sexual behavior will only be included
if it meets two limited exceptions - (1) unless such questions and evidence about
the complainant’s prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than
the respondent committed the conduct alleged by the complainant, or (2) if the questions
and evidence concern specific incidents of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior
with respect to the respondent and are offered to prove consent).
3.7 Disclosure
The College will not restrict the ability of either party to discuss the allegations
under investigation or to gather and present relevant evidence.
3.8 Inspection and Review of Evidence
Prior to completion of the investigative report, the College will send each party
and their advisor, if any, the relevant evidence directly related to the allegations
raised in a formal complaint, including the evidence upon which the College does not
intend to rely in reaching a determination regarding responsibility, and inculpatory
and exculpatory evidence whether obtained from the parties or other source, so that
each party can meaningfully respond to the evidence prior to conclusion of the investigation.
The evidence will be sent in electronic or hard copy format for inspection and review,
compliant with any reasonable request for disability accommodations under applicable
law. The parties have 10 calendar days to submit a written response, which the investigator
will consider prior to completion of the investigative report.
The College may impose upon the parties and their advisors restrictions or require non-disclosure agreements not to disseminate any of the evidence subject to inspection and review or use such evidence for any purpose unrelated to the grievance process. This includes an agreement by the parties not to photograph or otherwise copy the evidence, including “sensitive” material such as nude images.
On or before the end of the ten calendar day window in which parties submit their written responses to the evidence, the College will provide each party with the other party’s responses. The parties have two calendar days to respond to each other’s responses in writing, which the investigator will consider prior to completion of the investigative report.
3.9 Investigative Report
The Investigator will create an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant
evidence. The completed investigative report includes, among other things, summaries
of interviews with the complainant and the responding student; and (where applicable)
summaries of interviews of each witness, summaries of interviews with expert witnesses,
photographs of the relevant site(s) and related logs, other photographic, electronic,
and forensic evidence; and a detailed written summary of relevant evidence regarding
the event(s) in question.
If the complaint involves multiple complainants, multiple respondents, or both, the College may issue a single investigative report.
Prior to issuing the investigative report to the parties and their advisors, if any, the investigative report will be provided to the Student Title IX Coordinator and College Legal Counsel for review. At least 10 calendar days prior to a hearing or determination regarding responsibility, the College will provide to both parties and their advisors, if any, the investigative report in electronic format or a hard copy compliant with any reasonable request for disability accommodations under applicable law, for their review and written response, which will be added to the final investigative report materials. The written responses must be submitted on or before the 10 calendar day review period.
SECTION 4: Hearing
The grievance process provides for a live hearing, which is not a public hearing, once the final investigative report has been completed and the review period has concluded. The final investigative report, including all evidence that was subject to the party’s inspection and review, and the final investigative report written responses from the parties, will be available at the hearing to give each party equal opportunity to refer to such evidence prior to and during the hearing, including for purposes of cross-examination.
4.1 Decision Makers
The hearing members include a Hearing Chairperson, who presides over the hearing,
maintains hearing decorum, and is the decision-maker regarding relevancy of questions
from the Hearing Panel and during cross-examination; and the Hearing Panel, who is
the decision-maker(s) regarding responsibility of the respondent and issuance of sanctions
if the respondent is found responsible for a violation.
The Hearing Chairperson and Hearing Panel are part of a standing group of appointed individuals approved by the Dean of Student Affairs (or their designee) who are trained regarding Title IX, the grievance process, the Student Code of Conduct, and the hearing process among other topics. The Hearing Panel includes one LCC administrator and two LCC faculty for each hearing from the trained decision-maker group. Decision-makers, are not the same person(s) as the Title IX Coordinator or the Investigator(s).
The hearing members are to keep all information confidential and are trained and instructed to not publicly or privately disclose the names of the parties and advisors involved; and to not discuss the merits of the complaint with anyone not involved in the proceedings, including with the parties themselves or with the parties’ advisors or anyone acting on their behalf.
4.2 Hearing Notice
Once a Hearing Chairperson and Hearing Panel member has been named to a Panel, they
will receive a Notice of Hearing, which includes the hearing location, date, and time;
the names of the parties and their advisors; and a request for notification of a conflict
of interest or potential bias, if any. If it is deemed a conflict of interest or potential
bias exists between a Hearing Chairperson or Panel member and the parties, they will
be replaced by another Hearing Chairperson or Panel member.
Once the Hearing Chairperson and Hearing Panel members have been finalized, the parties
and their advisors will receive a Notice of Hearing, which includes the hearing location,
date, and time; the pre- hearing meeting location, date, and time; and the names of
the Hearing Chairperson and Hearing Panel members.
If a party wishes to challenge the participation of a Hearing Panel member, they must notify the Chairperson prior to the pre-hearing meeting stating the specific reason(s) for the objection. If it is deemed by the Chairperson that the challenge has merit, the Panel member will be replaced by another member. The Chairperson reserves discretion to make changes in the Panel composition at any time. Both parties will have an additional opportunity to challenge the participation of any Panel member at the beginning of the hearing if new information is presented that indicates a conflict of interest or bias may be present.
4.3 Pre-Hearing Meeting
A pre-hearing meeting will be scheduled individually with both parties and their advisors
prior to the hearing date. At the meeting, the Hearing Chairperson will review hearing
procedures; discuss safety measures and accommodations; review technology to be used
during the hearing; discuss hearing logistics; discuss character witnesses, review
the cross-examination process, including a discussion on relevant questions; and answer
any questions regarding the hearing process. The parties and their advisors may bring
preliminary cross-examination questions for review of relevancy to the pre-hearing
meeting.
4.4 Pre-Hearing Review Period
The final investigative report will be shared with the decision-makers prior to the
hearing. In addition to confidentiality outlined in 5.1, the decision-makers are instructed
not to discuss the investigative report with the Hearing Chairperson or other members
of the Panel prior to the Hearing.
The final investigative report, including all evidence that was subject to the party’s inspection and review, and the final investigative report written responses from the parties, will be available at the hearing to give the decision-makers opportunity to refer to the information prior to and during the hearing, including for purposes of asking questions of the parties and witnesses.
Hearing members and the parties and their advisors will be allotted time immediately prior to the start of the hearing, during the Pre-Hearing session, for final review of the hearing materials.
4.5 Advisors
Both parties may have an advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required
to be, an attorney present at the hearing in addition to a support person. If a party
does not have an advisor present at the hearing, the College will provide without
fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the College’s choice to conduct cross-
examination on behalf of that party. The support person does not have a speaking role
at the hearing. The advisor does not have an active speaking role in the hearing except
during cross examination, at which time they are permitted to ask the other party
and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those
challenging credibility. In addition, the advisor may inspect and review evidence
provided to the parties.
In the event that a party fails to appear at the hearing, the Advisor for that party
may attend the hearing if the absent party grants approval in writing to the Office
of Student Compliance, including providing questions they want their Advisor to ask
during cross examination. If the party has not provided questions in writing to the
Office of Student Compliance for cross-examination, the Advisor will be excused from
the hearing.
4.6 Witnesses
Witnesses who have been identified during the investigation will be called to participate
and provide information at the live hearing. The Hearing Panel and each party’s advisor
has the opportunity to ask the other party and any witnesses all relevant questions
and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility.
If a respondent is found responsible for a violation(s), the respondent may offer a character witness(es) to provide information to the Hearing Panel prior to the determination of sanctions. Identification of a character witness(es) must be made in advance of the hearing either at the pre- hearing meeting or a deadline set by the Chairperson. Respondents are responsible for the attendance of any character witnesses at the hearing.
4.7 Cross Examination
At the live hearing, each party’s advisor has the opportunity to ask the other party
and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those
challenging credibility. Cross- examination at the live hearing will be conducted
directly, orally, and in real time by the party’s advisor of choice. Only relevant
cross- examination and other questions may be asked of a party or witness. Before
a complainant, respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question,
the hearing chairperson will first determine whether the question is relevant, and
explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.
4.8 Questions Regarding Sexual History of Complainant
Questions and evidence about the complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual
behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the complainant’s
prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the respondent
committed the conduct alleged by the complainant, or if the questions and evidence
concern specific incidents of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect
to the respondent and are offered to prove consent.
4.9 Hearing Proceeding
The live hearings are conducted in person through the use of technology allowing parties
to be located in separate rooms with the technology enabling the Hearing Chairperson,
Hearing Panel and parties to simultaneously see, hear and participate in the hearing
proceedings as well as the participation of witnesses and other parties relevant to
the hearing proceeding. An audio recording of the hearing will be maintained and made
available to the parties for inspection and review upon request.
Both parties will have an opportunity to make opening statements to the Hearing Panel.
Hearing Panel members are permitted to ask relevant questions and follow-up questions
of the parties and any witnesses, including those regarding credibility. Only relevant
questions may be asked of a party or witness. Before a complainant, respondent, or
witness answers a question, the Hearing Chairperson will first determine whether the
question is relevant, and explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.
Each party’s advisor has the opportunity to ask the other party and any witnesses
all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility.
Cross- examination at the live hearing will be conducted directly, orally, and in
real time by the party’s advisor of choice as indicated in Section 4.7 above.
After all parties and witnesses have been questioned, each party may make a closing statement and request a short recess to prepare it. If the Hearing Panel determines that unresolved issues exist, they have an opportunity to ask any final questions prior to the determination regarding responsibility.
4.10 Standard of Proof
The preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) standard will be used in
reaching a determination regarding responsibility by a majority decision of the Hearing
Panel members.
4.11 Determination Regarding Responsibility
In making their determination, the Hearing Panel members will carefully review and
consider all of the information presented and follow the procedures stated in this
process. The decision-maker(s), will issue a written determination regarding responsibility
simultaneously to the parties. The determination regarding responsibility becomes
final either on the date that the College provides the parties with the written determination
of the result of an appeal (if an appeal is filed) or if an appeal is not filed, the
date on which an appeal would no longer be considered timely.
The written determination will include:
- Identification of the allegations potentially constituting sexual harassment.
- A description of the procedural steps taken from receipt of the formal complaint through the determination, including notifications to the parties, interviews with parties and witnesses, site visits (if applicable), methods used to gather other evidence, and the hearing.
- Findings of fact supporting the determination.
- Conclusions regarding the application of the Student Code of Conduct to the facts.
- A statement of, and rationale for, the result to each allegation, including a determination regarding responsibility, any disciplinary sanctions imposed on the respondent, and whether remedies designed to restore or preserve equal access to the College’s education program or activity will be provided to the complainant.
- Procedures, including permissible bases, for the complainant and respondent to file an appeal.
The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for effective implementation of any remedies.
4.12 Election of Informal Process
At any time prior to reaching a determination regarding responsibility under the formal
hearing process, the College may facilitate an Informal Resolution, including when
a responding student wishes to accept responsibility for some or all of the alleged
violations, and the complainant agrees. The College will obtain the parties’ voluntary,
written consent to the Informal Resolution prior to proceeding with the informal process.
SECTION 5: Informal Resolution
A complainant who wishes to file a Formal Complaint with the Student Title IX Coordinator may request an Informal Resolution. Although less formal than a formal investigation and hearing process, Informal Resolution may be an appropriate resolution process and is not mediation. The College will not require the parties to participate in an Informal Resolution and will not offer an Informal Resolution unless a Formal Complaint is filed. The College will not require as a condition of enrollment or continuing enrollment, or employment or continuing employment, or enjoyment of any other right, a waiver of the right to an investigation and hearing of a Formal Complaint of sexual harassment. The College may also determine when an Informal Resolution may be appropriate.
The College will obtain the parties’ voluntary, written consent to the Informal Resolution, and will provide the parties written notice disclosing the allegations and the requirements of the Informal Resolution process, including the circumstances under which it precludes the parties from resuming a Formal Complaint arising from the same allegations. Either party can withdraw from any Informal Resolution offered by the College at any time prior to agreeing to the resolution (which may include expulsion of the respondent) and commence or resume the Formal Grievance Process with respect to the Formal Complaint, and any consequences resulting from participating in the Informal Resolution, including the records that will be maintained or could be shared. The College may impose disciplinary sanctions against a respondent as part of an Informal Resolution, and both parties must agree to the resolution. If expulsion is the sanction proposed as part of an Informal Resolution, that result can only occur if both parties agree to the resolution. If a respondent, for example, does not believe that expulsion is appropriate then the respondent can withdraw from the Informal Resolution process and resume the formal grievance process.
5.1 Purpose of Informal Resolution
Both parties must attend the Informal Resolution proceeding, and both parties must
fully participate in a respectable manner and with a sense of decorum. Informal Resolution
provides an opportunity for the complainant and the responding student, in the presence
of, and facilitated by, a presiding officer, to communicate their feelings and perceptions
regarding the incident, the impact of the incident, and their wishes and expectations
going forward.
5.2 Advisors
The complainant and the responding student each may bring an advisor to the Informal
Resolution. Advisors do not have an active speaking role at the Informal Resolution.
5.3 Presiding Officer
A Panel Chair or a designee of the Chair will facilitate the Informal Resolution,
and may elect to be assisted by another member of the Panel or a designee of the Panel.
5.4 Responding Student Acknowledges Responsibility
If during the course of the Informal Resolution the responding student elects to acknowledge
their actions and take responsibility for the alleged sexual harassment, the Presiding
Officer will ask for input of the parties on the determination of sanction(s) and
will take a break to determine proposed sanction(s). The Presiding Officer will then
present the proposed sanction(s) to the parties. The parties must agree on the sanction(s).
If the parties disagree, further deliberation will take place until the parties are
in agreement. Once agreement on sanctions has been reached, the Informal Resolution
will be concluded, and the complaint will be resolved without any further rights of
appeal by either party. In the event an agreement cannot be reached regarding sanction(s),
either party can withdraw from the Informal Resolution and commence or resume instead
the Formal Grievance Process with respect to the Formal Complaint.
5.5 Responding Student Contests Responsibility
If the responding student contests the complaint of alleged sexual harassment, and
the complainant agrees, the Informal Resolution will be concluded, and the complaint
will be resolved without any further rights of appeal by either party. If the complainant
disagrees, either party can withdraw from the Informal Resolution and commence or
resume the Formal Grievance Process with respect to the Formal Complaint.
During the contesting of responsibility, either party or the Presiding Officer may introduce a discussion regarding educational topics related to the incident.
5.6 Supportive Measures
Supportive Measures may be offered or continued, if already established, at the conclusion
of the Informal Resolution, including the Presiding Officer imposing a no contact
order agreed upon by the parties or based on information derived from the Informal
Resolution proceedings, taken together with any other relevant information known to
the College at the time of the Informal Resolution.
5.7 Election of Formal Process
The College or the parties may, at any time prior to the conclusion of the Informal
Resolution, elect to end such proceedings and initiate the formal grievance process.
In such cases, statements or disclosures made by the parties in the course of the
Informal Resolution may be considered in the subsequent formal grievance process.
5.8 Privacy of Informal Resolution
In order to promote honest and direct communication, information disclosed during
Informal Resolution must remain private while the Informal Resolution is pending,
except where disclosure may be required by law or authorized in connection with duties
on behalf of the College.
SECTION 6: Sanctions
The Hearing Panel or the Presiding Officer in an Informal Resolution is required to consider the sanctions listed below for any student found responsible for sexual harassment and misconduct that they find to be fair and proportionate to the violation. In determining an appropriate sanction, the Panel or the Presiding Officer may consider any record of past violations of the Student Code of Conduct as well as the nature and severity of such past violation(s). The Panel or the Presiding Officer will also consider, as part of its deliberations, whether the sanction will (a) bring an end to the violation in question, (b) reasonably prevent a recurrence of a similar violation, and (c) remedy the effects of the violation on the complainant and the College community. The sanction decision will be made by the Panel by majority vote in the formal process or with agreement by both parties in an Informal Resolution. Any sanction imposed will include a justification in the written determination of the Panel or the Informal Resolution.
The College will issue sanctions consistent with the impact of the offense on the College community. Progressive sanctioning principles will be followed in that the student’s prior discipline history at the College will be taken into account. The following sanctions may be issued:
a. Written Warning – A written notice to the student that the student has violated College regulations.
b. Probation – A period of observation and review of conduct during which the student or student group or organization must demonstrate compliance with College standards. Probation is for a designated period of time and includes the probability of additional sanctions if the student or student group or organization is found to violate any College regulation(s) during the probationary period. Probation may be issued for any violation(s), but will be issued for all alcohol and drug violations and all violations resulting in sanctions of suspension or dismissal.
c. Restrictions - Denial of access to specific areas of the College or participation in certain groups or activities for a designated period of time and for clearly stated reasons.
d. Restitution – Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
e. Discretionary Sanctions – Educational assignments, essays, or other related discretionary assignments.
Discretionary sanctions for sexual misconduct offenses specifically, may include meeting with an LCC Counselor to discuss sexual harassment and/or completion of education programs.
f. No contact order – an order prohibiting contact between the responding student and the complainant, witnesses, and/or other individuals including any/all unwarranted communications between the parties including, but not limited to, communication via technology, third party communication, or face to face.
g. Suspension – Separation of the student from the College for a specified length of time (usually a year or less) after which the student is eligible to return. Conditions for readmission may be specified. Suspensions may be effective immediately or deferred (e.g., a suspension issued toward the end of a semester may be deferred to the day after the end of that semester).
When students are issued a suspension, re-entry to the College is determined at the return from suspension meeting with the Office of Student Compliance. All sanctions must be completed prior to the return from suspension meeting.
h. Dismissal – Separation of the student from the College for a year or more. The student may be eligible for return. Conditions for readmission may be specified. Dismissals will be effective immediately.
When students are issued a dismissal, re-entry to the College is determined at the return from dismissal meeting with the Office of Student Compliance. All sanctions must be completed prior to the return from dismissal meeting.
i. Expulsion – Termination of the student from the College permanently. Expulsions will be effective immediately.
j. Revocation of Admission and/or Degree – Admission to or a degree awarded from the College may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, or other violation of College standards in obtaining the degree, or for other serious violations committed by a student prior to graduation.
j. Withholding degree or certificate - The College may withhold awarding a degree otherwise earned until the completion of the process set forth in the Student Code of Conduct, including the completion of all sanctions imposed, if any.
More than one of the sanctions listed above may be imposed for any single violation.
The following sanctions may be imposed for student groups or organizations:
a. Those sanctions listed above (a-j).
b. Loss of selected rights and privileges for a specified period of time.
c. Loss of Recognition- Registered Student Organizations may lose recognition and
will be deprived of the use of College resources, the use of the College’s name, and
the right to participate in College or campus-sponsored activities. The loss of recognition
may be for a specific period of time or for an indefinite period of time until stated
all conditions are met.
The decision of the Panel in the formal process, including the sanction(s), if applicable, will be announced to both parties, concurrently, by the Chair at the conclusion of the hearing. In addition, the Chair will provide a copy of the Panel’s decision to both parties, concurrently, and to the Student Title IX Coordinator, within five calendar days following the conclusion of the hearing (or longer if the Chair determines there is good cause).
Sanctions imposed by the Panel become effective immediately until the resolution of any timely appeal of the Panel’s decision. The Provost (or their designee) may suspend the determination pending exhaustion of any appeals by the responding student pursuant to the Appeals Section, may allow the responding student to attend classes or to engage in other activity on a supervised or monitored basis, or may make such other modifications to the determination as may be advisable in the sole discretion of the Provost (or their designee). The Provost’s (or their designee) decision may not be appealed.
SECTION 7: Appeals
Either party may appeal the College’s Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or the Hearing Panel's decision by notifying the Office of Student Compliance (for College Dismissal of a Formal Complaint) or Hearing Chairperson of the Panel (for Hearing Panel decision) in writing within ten (10) working days of the date of the College’s decision for Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or the Hearing Panel's decision. Such appeals shall be in writing by completing the appeal form, including any additional information, and submitting it to the Office of Student Compliance. Both parties will be notified in writing upon receipt of an appeal, and will be given five (5) working days to submit a written statement in support of, or challenging, the College Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or the Hearing Panel’s decision.
The Provost (or their designee) shall have the sole authority to determine whether
or not an appeal warrants further review. An appeal that has been accepted for review
shall be limited to review of the information submitted in the appeal. In addition
for appeals regarding College Dismissal of a Formal Complaint, the review shall be
limited to the documents and supporting documents regarding the Formal Complaint resulting
in Dismissal. For appeals regarding the Hearing Panel’s decision, the review shall
be limited to the verbatim record of the Panel Hearing and supporting documents.
Appeals for College Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or the Hearing Panel’s decision
are for one or more of the following reasons only:
- A procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter;
- New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding dismissal of the formal complaint or determination regarding responsibility was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter;
- The Title IX Coordinator(s), Investigator(s), or Decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual complainant or respondent that affected the outcome of the matter;
- A sanction that is (substantially) disproportionate to the severity of the violation.
Appeal for Dismissal of a Formal Complaint
If an appeal is based on (a) or (b) (as listed above) and is approved by the Provost (or their designee), the matter shall be returned to the grievance process as determined by the Provost (or their designee).
If the appeal is based on (c) (as listed above), and is approved by the Provost (or
their designee), the matter shall be returned to the grievance process with a new
Title IX Coordinator or Investigator or
Decision-maker as determined by the Provost (or their designee).
Appeal of the Hearing Panel’s Decision
If an appeal is based on (a) (b) or (c) (as listed above) and is approved by the Provost (or their designee), the matter shall be returned to a new Hearing Panel and Hearing Chairperson for a rehearing, which will take into consideration the suggestions made by the Provost (or their designee) in addition to the facts that were originally presented.
If an appeal is based on (d) (as listed above) and is approved by the Provost (or their designee), the matter will be returned to a new Hearing Panel and Hearing Chairperson to determine sanction(s) only.
The decision of any new Panel, after it has rendered its decision in any of these cases, shall be final upon all involved.
If an appeal is not approved by the Provost (or their designee), the matter shall be considered final upon all involved.
After an appeal of College Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or the Hearing Panel decision, both parties will be notified simultaneously in writing of the appeal outcome, including the rationale for the decision.
Supportive measures, such as mutual no-contact orders or academic course adjustments for either or both parties may continue in place throughout an appeal process.
SECTION 8: Revisions
This Process may be revised, in writing, by the College at any time in compliance with regulatory guidance, College policies, and processes. The College will maintain the most updated process on the LCC website.
Revised: March 11, 2024
Reference
This grievance process covers complaints of alleged sexual harassment by College students in accordance with the College’s Prohibited Sex or Gender Based Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct Policy. A copy of the Policy may be found here:
https://www.lcc.edu/consumer-information/sexual-misconduct.html
Please see the Policy for expanded definitions used throughout this process.
Further information about Title IX and sex discrimination in education is available from the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202- 1100 (by Customer Service Hotline: 800-421- 3481; TTY: 800-877-8339; email: ocr@ed.gov or at http://www.ed.gov/ocr).
7. Definitions
- Dating violence includes, but is not limited to, sexual or physical abuse or the threat of such abuse.
- Dating violence does not include acts covered under the definition of domestic violence.
- By a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the complainant;
- By a person with whom the complainant shares a child in common;
- By a person who is cohabitating with, or has cohabitated with, the complainant as a spouse or intimate partner;
- By a person similarly situated to a spouse of the complainant under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime of violence occurred;
- By any other person against an adult or youth complainant who is protected from that person’s act under the domestic or family violence laws of the jurisdiction in which the crime of violence occurred.
- Restrict a person’s access to money, assets, credit, or financial information;
- Unfairly use a person’s personal economic resources, including money, assets, and credit, for one’s own advantage; or
- Exert undue influence over a person’s financial and economic behavior or decisions, including forcing default on joint or other financial obligations, exploiting powers of attorney, guardianship, or conservatorship, or failing or neglecting to act in the best interests of a person to whom one has a fiduciary duty.
- Internet-enabled devices;
- online spaces and platforms;
- computers;
- mobile devices;
- cameras and imaging programs;
- apps;
- location tracking devices;
- or communication technologies;
- or any other emerging technologies
- Invasion of sexual privacy (e.g., engaging in sexual voyeurism or permitting others to witness or observe the nudity or sexual or intimate activity of another person) without that person’s consent;
- Indecent or lewd exposure or inducing others to expose themselves when consent is not present;
- Recording any person’s nudity or sexual or intimate activity in a private space without that person’s consent;
- Sharing or distributing sexual information, or images or recordings of a person’s nudity or sexual activity, without that person’s consent;
- Recruiting, harboring, transporting, providing, or obtaining another person for the purpose of sexual exploitation, such as prostitution;
- Knowingly exposing someone to or transmitting HIV or an STI/STD to another person;
- Inducing incapacitation in another person with the intent to engage in sexual conduct, regardless of whether prohibited sexual conduct actually occurs.
- Following, appearing within sight of, or confronting a person;
- Being or remaining in close proximity to a person;
- Appearing at a person’s residence or place of employment;
- Monitoring, observing, or conducting surveillance of a person;
- Threatening (directly or indirectly) a person;
- Communicating with a person by telephone, mail, or electronic communications;
- Placing an object on or delivering an object to a place owned, leased, or occupied by a person;
- Interfering with or damaging a person’s property (including pets).
- Course of conduct means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property.
- Reasonable person means a reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the complainant.
- Substantial emotional distress means significant mental suffering or anguish that may but does not necessarily require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.