|
I'd like to use essay tests,
but...
Marilla Svinicki, University
of Texas at Austin
Essay question: Discuss the
importance of the nature/nurture controversy in the shaping
of current developmental theory. Student answer: The nature/nuture
(sic) controversy was very impotent (sic) in shaping current
developmental theory becuse (sic) it was needed to help
people who were doing work in that area to come up with
their current theories.......(Huh?)
Do you cringe when
you read the kind of tortured prose and fractured thinking that is represented
by the above example? Or plow through paragraph after paragraph of
detail in a student's answer in hopes of finding an original thought somewhere
in the pile? Or find yourself subconsciously reading more into an
answer than is really there as you try to interpret the meaning of a student's
essay?
Most instructors who
venture into using essay tests will experience one or more of these phenomena
somewhere along the line. It has been our habit in the past to blame
the students, the school system and the English department for not teaching
our students how to write a solidly argued, concisely worded essay answer,
but we must face the fact that we are as much to blame for their imprecise
prose as those other entities. The "Writing Across the Curriculum"
movement of several years ago urged instructors in all departments to help
their students learn to write more coherent prose, whether it be in papers
or essay tests, not just to improve student writing but to encourage more
complex thinking. Having to explain an answer in prose format requires
more from the student in the way of deep processing of the material than
is usually the case on objectively scorable exam questions.
Many instructors across
campus subscribed to these ideas enthusiastically, but were stymied when
it came to putting them into practice in their classes. They increased
the use of essay questions, but didn't know how to help their students
improve other than exhorting them to do better.
Part of the problem
may lie in the way instructors help ( or fail to help) students prepare
for writing essay tests. Learning specialists have known for a long
time that the kind of preparation needed for responding to essay questions
is different from that needed for objective tests. Unfortunately,
many of our students are unaware of that difference. They prepare
for all exams with the same learning strategies, and then are ill-equipped
to tackle the kind of thinking needed during essay tests. In fact,
they may be surprised to learn that they might need to actually think through
and construct an answer for a test rather than being able to quickly search
their memory for an already extant answer which can then be simply spewed
out on the test.
If we want the students
to be able to deal with the complex nature of essay tests and other forms
of spontaneous writing, there are some things we can do in our instruction
that will prepare them more adequately. The following list of suggestions
is by no means exhaustive, but it should serve as a stimulus for your own
thinking about how your students might best prepare for your tests.
Help them think
differently about the material.
Students are conditioned
from an early age to think in terms of discrete facts and "correct" answers
rather than looking for the relationships which are characteristic of essay
answers. One of the first steps toward improved essay answers is
to adopt a different perspective on the nature of what is to be learned
from the material presented and read. To help students think about
the material differently, the instructor can:
a. encourage
them to integrate material from class to class and unit to unit.
For example, you can give them a set of integrative questions to ask themselves
each time they begin a new topic, questions like
How does
this topic compare with/relate to what has gone before?
How is
it different? How is it similar?
Why is
it included in the course? Why at this point?
What are
its main points, its strengths, its weaknesses?
How does
it apply to the overall goal of the course?
b. have them write
their own sample essay questions for each lecture or reading assignment
and then in class, discuss those that most closely parallel what you would
ask.
c. explain
the levels of cognitive complexity (such as Bloom's taxonomy) which might
be expected of them in the course and differentiate between knowledge of
facts and ability to analyze and critique material.
d. emphasize
process during classtime itself, so that the students begin to understand
how conclusions are reached rather than focusing on the conclusions alone.
Help them study
the material differently.
Studying for essay
exams is much different from studying for objectively-scorable exams.
Instructors should encourage students to:
a. create
outlines of readings and lecture notes which emphasize the relationships
among the ideas.
b. draw concept
maps, which are visual diagrams of how terms, principles, and ideas interconnect.
c. paraphrase
or create an executive summary for each reading or lecture.
Help them write
structurally sound answers.
To help students compile
the information they have learned into answers which are written more effectively
and efficiently, an instructor can:
a. provide
a list of key words used in essay questions and what they imply in terms
of answer content and structure.
b. give students
opportunities to practice writing essay answers in class and discussing
the structure of the answers.
c. assign
brief out-of-class essay questions with which to practice and provide individual
feedback on the writing. You may wish to develop a feedback phrase
sheet, which lists your most commonly used comments and an extended description
of what that comment means. Then the feedback on the answer itself
can be written using the key phrase instead of the entire comment.
(To get really efficient, just use a set of numbered phrases.)
d. give the
students an opportunity to grade an essay answer using the system you normally
use so that they will understand how they are being evaluated.
e. provide
examples of good and poor answers to essay questions with an explanation
of why they are evaluated that way.
f. show students
how to use algorithms for answering typical question types. For example,
a prototype answer for a "compare and contrast" item might always include
two points of similarity between the two concepts and two points of difference.
Help them develop generic outlines or concepts maps for common types of
questions into which they can plug the specifics of the topic.
g. help them
learn time management techniques for essay writing. For example,
scanning all the items and parceling out an appropriate amount of time
to spend on each according to weight or importance; spending a few minutes
outlining an answer before writing, possibly even giving some credit in
grading for content which appears on an outline, but was not included in
the answer due to time constraints; having a checklist for quickly evaluating
answers before completing the exam (such as "did you answer the question?"
"are the transitions clear?" "is evidence provided for each assertion?"
and so on).
Why should we
bother?
There is actually an
additional selfish motive for improving students' essay writing skills:
it makes the grading process much easier. When students learn how
to read an essay question and from the structure of the question, select
an answer protocol that insures that all parts of the answer are present
and well-organized, the task of grading those answers becomes less one
of interpretation and more one of evaluation.
When students can write
well-argued essays in clear and concise prose, it actually can be a pleasure
to grade their work. It certainly will take less time and mental
effort. In the long run both parties benefit.
Unfortunately there
is no guarantee that all students will be able to use these strategies
to improve their essay writing, but at least they would be aware that integrative
essay questions require a different type of preparation than they may have
used in the past. That awareness may be the first step on the developmental
path to the higher level thinking characteristic of college level work.
This publication is part of an 8-part series of essays originally published
by The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
For more information about the POD Network, please link to the POD web site at
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~ckfgill or
http://www.podweb.org.
|